Film review: 'Thugs of Hindustan' to deceive Nepali viewers!

On the basis of the trailer along with the Dandang voice, on the basis of the festival, Nepali comrades arrived in the streets to see 'Thugs of Hindustan' movie. However, after watching the movie, Nepali viewers realized that they were deceived. Because, the story of this film was also tired and the message to society was not good. In the rights of Nepali, this movie is definitely unrelated.

Today, there have been two / four hundred years since the days of thieves have remained stagnant in Indian society. Natwarlal is also a citizen of India, not other countries. And, even now, Indian society has not been able to get rid of the ruins of the thugs.

However, the movie 'Thugs of Hindustan', which is an actor of famous artists like Aamir Khan, Abhitabh Bachchan and Katrina Kaif, have not discussed any of the current Indian society's organizations. Thugs have not satanized, but have been attempted to make heroes.

The movie has given a negative message to society by looking to present the thugs as a great hero and a positive character. Thugs show that India has played a revolutionary role in the struggle of national independence, which is the main theme of the movie.

'Thugs of Hindustan' What is in the movie?

The main story of Thugs of Hindustan is not the current society, but in the past century, there is a war of independence in India against the British ruler.

Abhabhab Bachchan played revolutionary role in the film and Amir Khan, who appeared as a rangling, has sometimes played the role of the British in favor of India. But at last, Thummer Aamir Khan goes against British and stands in the film as a positive character. The movie has shown great to Thug. The British has shown that the revolutionaries are just accused of fraud.

The film is the most fascinating sight of the movie to present the fraud and cheats as a protagonist.

Thugs of Hindustan is a story of 1759. At the time when British India's name was named in the name of the East India Company.

The Rukakpur kingdom, which was shown in the film, was not in English hold. The Khodabakhs Ship, the commander of his army, was abducted by his (Amitabh Bachchan). After the death of Mirza Saheb, his daughter Jaffirai along with the jungle led the revolutionary army.

In this movie, 11 years after the movie, Firangi Mullah (Aamir Khan) has an entry. He specializes in lying, deceiving and earning money. Catherine has played the role of Suryaiya in the actress of the British ruler.

The Thugs of Hindustan (Aamir Khan) who walk on the revolutionary revolution in the hope of getting money and landlords eventually betray the British and help the revolutionary distrust of the East India company.


The thugs mounted at the end of the movie (Aamir) now go to Britain and forget the wisdom of the British and can be filmed.

'Thugs of Hindustan' Irrelevant to Nepal

Looking at the relativity of Nepalese viewers, the story of bravery that Indians had fought with the British centuries centuries ago is not a very relevant topic for Nepali. What is shown in the 'Thugs of Hindustan', the story of the heroic, does not make the Nepali audience very proud. Do not touch

Furthermore, this is not the involvement of Indian people in the struggle with the British. The thug has been shown to be defeated by the trick. It is shown that Indians are very skilled to put dental minds, such a 'unhappy' is not a very commendable and attractive theme for Nepali audiences.

It is not a positive side in the society to show that the film's protagonist should be selfish and explicitly present. So, this movie is neither relevant to Nepali nor educated. Rather, the story goes wrong and the film has deteriorated Nepali viewers badly. Who goes to see the movie in Cinema, he feels that the ticket money is taken for waste.


The movie has raised the question on the beliefs of Nepalese that the movies acting as stars like Aamir and Katrina and Anita, are good and messaging. Although the level of art and acting in the film is technically high quality. Why not? When making this movie, about 250 million rupees have been spent.

'Thug of Hindustan' The story of the thug ruler

The story of 'Thugs of Hindustan' is based on the novel 'Confessions of a Thug' (English version SP), by English writer Philip Meadow Taylor in 1883.

Taylor talked about Aamir al-Qaishe, a commander of the thug in jail at that time. The book describes how Taylor has a big problem in combining the things he says and how he relies on fraud. The movie 'Thugs of Hindustan' is the story of the three tricks.

The Confessions of a Thug, written in 1883, contains about 5 pages thick. Taylor wrote in the book- 'From thunderstorm to Deccan the fog of thugs was spread. It was so hard to arrest them that they used to work very secretly. It was difficult to think of ways to distinguish them from the common man. They used to work together with a lot of work, so that no one should be suspicious.

According to the book of Taylor, printed by Oxford University Press, at that time, 1059 people were not completely convicted of fraud in order to lay down the frauds, which was left behind at the Penang island in Malaysia, so that they could not return to India.

Similarly, 412 suspects had been hanged and 87 were given life imprisonment.

Among them, Taylor wrote a book after a talk with Aamir Alice, who  was in the prison, for a few days, which became a novel. And, on the basis of this, now the 'Thugs of Hindustan' is out.

The message of old novels and new movies gives the power of the fraud of India very strong and since now.